
As legend has it, Bill Gates supposedly said in the early days of the PC that 640 kilobytes of memory were “enough for anybody.” Whether he ever actually said it is disputed – Gates himself denies it to this day. But the quote has stuck around, because it captures so neatly the question everyone was asking back then: how much is actually enough?
Today the very same question is back – for a surprisingly different reason.
Back then, the answer was spectacularly wrong. 640 kilobytes – that’s less than a single photo from your phone takes up today. Anyone buying a new computer faces the same decision, just with different numbers: 8, 16 or 32 gigabytes? And while the ads and your gut have been whispering “more is better” for years, there’s a very concrete reason right now to take a closer look.
Let’s start with the misconception almost everyone shares – and the one that costs the most money when you buy RAM.
RAM is space, not speed
The most common mix-up about memory goes like this: “More RAM makes my computer faster.” That isn’t true. More RAM does not make a computer faster. It only keeps it from getting slow when too much is open at once.
The distinction sounds like hairsplitting, but it’s crucial. Picture your memory as the size of a desk. On the desk you spread out whatever you’re working on: the spreadsheet, the letter, the ten open browser tabs, the photo editor. The bigger the desk, the more you can spread out at once before things get cramped.
But – and this is the point – a bigger desk doesn’t let you work faster. You don’t write any quicker just because there’s more space. You can only leave more things lying out at once without anything falling off.
It’s exactly the same with RAM. If you work with your 8 or 16 gigabytes and never hit the limit, then there’s still plenty of free space on your desk. A bigger desk wouldn’t change that – the free space would simply be even bigger. You’d notice no difference at all from 32 gigabytes.
Things only get cramped once the desk is full. That’s when the computer starts shuffling things off to the side – it pushes data it isn’t using onto the hard drive and pulls it back when it needs it again. That takes time, and that’s exactly when the computer becomes noticeably slow. More RAM helps in that case, because the desk is then big enough that all this back-and-forth shuffling disappears.
The takeaway is simple: more RAM only helps someone who regularly hits the limit. Anyone who doesn’t is buying pure reserve that never gets used. Not wrong – but also without any noticeable effect.
Memory has gotten expensive
Until now, too much RAM was mostly just wasted money. Since 2025/26 it’s noticeably more than that: the prices for memory have shot up dramatically, in some cases multiplying several times over.
The reason isn’t supply shortages like during the pandemic, but a shift: the AI industry is buying up the world’s memory production. The enormous data centers behind the big AI services need vast amounts of specialized memory – and manufacturers are moving their production to wherever they can earn the most. Ordinary memory for PCs, laptops, and phones gets scarce and pricey as a result.
Exactly how much, the figures vary – depending on the source and the type of memory, the range runs from steep markups all the way to a three- or fourfold increase. No single number can be pinned down, and the trend probably hasn’t run its course yet. The only thing that’s certain: memory has gotten genuinely expensive right now.
How about a little less?
This is where the two observations meet. On one side, more RAM makes no difference as long as you never reach the limit. On the other, more RAM has just become especially expensive.
So right now it pays off twice over to ask honestly: do I really need the 32 gigabytes – or will 16 do? For the vast majority of everyday users, the answer is: 16 gigabytes is plenty, often even 8. Not out of stinginess, but because more simply makes no noticeable difference when you never reach the limit anyway. Anyone who uses Office programs, browses the web, writes emails, looks at photos and streams movies will get along comfortably with that much space.
See for yourself – before you spend money
Here’s the nice part: you don’t have to take my word for it. You can check. Before you start thinking about more memory, you can find out in a few moments whether RAM is even the bottleneck for you.
On Windows, open the Task Manager by pressing the Ctrl, Shift, and Esc keys at the same time. There you’ll find the memory usage display. On the Mac, the tool is called Activity Monitor – you’ll find it through Spotlight search or in the “Utilities” folder.
Just leave the window open in the background while you work as usual: open tabs, launch programs, the typical workload of a normal day. And then take a look: am I constantly at the limit – or almost never?
- If your memory usage sits permanently at the top under normal use, then your desk really is too small. In that case, more RAM brings a real gain.
- If, on the other hand, there’s always room to spare – and that’s the case for most people – then extra memory would simply sit there unused.
A second suspect when your computer drags
One more tip if an older computer feels sluggish: often it isn’t the memory that’s to blame at all, but an old, mechanical hard drive. In such cases, switching to an SSD usually brings far more speed than doubling your RAM – and is often the more worthwhile investment. But that’s a story of its own.
Rough ballpark figures for orientation
If you’d like a quick rundown, here are the sizes without brand names and without price tags, which would only go out of date anyway:
- 8 GB: the minimum. Enough for browsing, Office and email. Gets tight when lots of browser tabs and several programs are open at once.
- 16 GB: the sensible standard for the vast majority – this is the clear recommendation. Enough reserve without paying for something you’ll never need.
- 32 GB: only worth it for special workloads, like video editing, large photo work or virtual machines. For the everyday user, it’s money out the window – especially at today’s prices.
With a classic desktop computer, it’s also worth asking whether the memory can be expanded later on. If so, you can comfortably start small and add more when you need it, instead of paying up front for the future – though with many laptops and compact computers this isn’t possible, since the memory there is soldered in place.
640 kilobytes then, 16 gigabytes now
Back then, people asked “how much is enough?” and got the answer wrong, because nobody guessed how much the demands would grow. Today the same question comes up – but for most people the most honest answer isn’t “as much as possible,” but “as much as you actually use.” And under normal use, that’s surprisingly often 16 gigabytes.
How much RAM is actually in your computer – and do you ever hit the limit? Do you still remember your first computer and how little memory it had? And just for a chuckle: what’s the smallest amount you ever got by with? We’d love to hear your memories in the comments.
Comments
When I got computer with 64K, it was 8 bit Apple 2 I think, it was like early Christmas.
Now I am greedy for memory, anything less than 64G on Windows makes me sad.
It is interesting that MacOS and my favorite Linux distros (Ubuntu, Fedora, Garuda) have a little less thirsty for memory.
Any way 64G is my target. Did I mention that I am a developer?
https://vimeo.com/1210018551?fl=tl&fe=ec&share=copy
Pues 16 Gb es más que suficiente para trabajar y ser ordenado
i've had over 100 tabs open before it starts to show signs of slowinng down
On a side note, recently sold my Amiga 1500. I had upgraded it with a SCSI controller for a 1 Gb Seagate SCSI drive.
The controller could hold 8 Mb of ZIP RAM. It booted quicker than my AMD rig with a 400 MHz processor and 384 Mb RAM running Windows 98 SE and power down times quicker than any other computer. Amigas jus had an on/off switch.
Avec windows 11, concrêtement avec 1 jeu (Wow) et des logiciels de bureautique ouverts (y compris OndeDrive, whatsapp, un VPN) , je suis déjà à 55% de mémoire => à 16Go j'aurais ramé un peu ...
Quelques aberrations, je n'ouvre même pas Edge qu'il consomme déjà autour de 300Mo de mémoire ! et le widget météo consomme aussi près de 1Go car trop de publicité avec, celui là je l'ai viré.
De base suivez la recommandation de l'article, et faites atention à voir si la ram est extensible ou pas. Et prenez des SSD rapides, ça vaut le coup aussi.
TRS-DOS operating system and machine code on a Z-80 chip was efficient for any documents, spreadsheets or databases.
Conserving memory usage was a way of life and always paid dividends in performance. That is still true today. This system with additional drives continued in service running businesses until finally retired in 2000. Try that today with Windows!
Any Linux distribution will perform really well with modest 8GB RAM and brilliantly with more - compared to today’s memory hogging and memory wasteful-by-design Windows OS’s which choke on anything less than 16 GB.
Keeping multiple windows open in any OS just because you can - is lazy, inefficient, wasteful and expensive in RAM. Heavy CAD/CAM users, serious video editors and rocket scientists excepted.
Certes ce n'est pas pour le plaisir mais pour raisons professionnelles :)
Additionally I still help out QTVIs (Qualified Teachers of the Vision Impaired) after 19 years of modifying texts for students from 3 to 25, and in lockdown was extremely grateful I had purchased SoftMaker Office 2018 Professional for the princely sum of just under £25 in November before lockdown. This involved using Okular and TextMaker and GIMP, the latter used to modify images in reading books, the trickiest bit was getting those images that span two pages at the bottom, or left and right margin images. Low-vision readers need everything left aligned so pictures would be partway down the page or if large, on a page of their own, so they get to see what their sighted peers see. With some students, 'noise' created by too much detail requires the removal of most of the background imagery, focusing on principal characters in the imagery and avoid background distraction which as well as causing visual issues would slow down reading. I would also use additional apps, such as the command line tool 'ocrmypdf' especially useful where PDFs contained images of text, and I was very grateful for 'pdftk' which is a command line tool for repairing corrupt PDFs. This came to the rescue as I was working on a mock AS Physics paper when I was having issues with pdfStudio Pro which actually turned out to be a failing hard drive (and working from home!). The replacement hard drive arrived in time and so pdftk, LibreOffice Draw helped save the day. (LibreOffice Draw can read PDFs and MS Publisher files but not edit). LibreOffice Draw was used to rescue the modified diagrams I originally made in Inkscape, from the corrupted PDF without having to start over. The mock paper was completed on deadline. Phew!
For anyone interested in my current project you can view and/or download it here (it is still a work in progress):
https://murena.io/s/ZoCZB7EWHGJ7zQC
My current
1K of built in RAM. Yep One K. Ram on BASIC for an OS.
And a person had to manually type in the
program to be used (very slow process) but it worked. However the Timex
Sinclair was quickly eclipsed by the Commodore Vic-20 with expandable Ram
capability and the urge to have more and more Ram has continued. My first PC had 256K that I quickly upgraded to 512K which was a HUGE amount of Ram for
the day. Fun times.
In this case the speed at which programs would run was ridiculous. In the time it took me to run all my weekly utility checks on my computer, I could only run one of the same programs on his. Keeping in mind that it was the only program running.
My 8GB was ample but we ended up replacing both units, mine with 16GB and his with 8GB and his flies just as fast as mine. I mean WOW!
What I'd like to see here, if you have it archived please point me to it, or put out something that instructs me to the best procedure for recycling or disposing of a couple old computers. Thanks for another great article.
And before you dispose of them why not try GNU/Linux yourself? I highly recommend Q4OS Plasma with Look Switcher, MX-Linux 25.1 KDE Plasma (whatever you setup in the live session can be remembered post install!) and Linux Mint Debian Edition with kde-standard post install.
Current unit has 32 GB of memory, and I pin the memory usage on a regular basis. This is because I am a gamer, and this is a category of users for which the maximum amount of Ram is crucial.
The BIG question in the future is whether or not computers will start coming with continuous memory (RAM + VRam in one package) so that the memory is fully utilized for AI local models. Mac Mini has this feature, but it is not that mainstream. There are a number of computers based on the new AMD AI architecture that come with continous memory. Let's hope that in the future this becomes the norm for laptop environments.
My first computer was a Commodore VIC-20 with 3.5k of ram (actually 4k but the O/S and screen memory ate into it.
Les questions à se poser sont, à mon avis, notamment les suivantes :
1/ As tu besoin de travailler en multâches avec plusieurs applications ouvertes en même temps ?
2/ Ton travaille se limte t-il a de la bureautique simple (traitement de texte, tableur, présentation simple, email ?
3/ Ton travail implique t'il des traitements lourds du type graphisme, 3D, vidéo, animation 2d ou 3d, traitements IA complexes etc.
4/ Ton pc est-il un serveur ?
5/ Quel Os pour quel travail (Windows, linux etc)
Bref, voilà pour quelques questions de base.
Pour ma part, un PC avec 16g aura tendance à 'saturer".
La question est donc, à mon avis, celle de l'usage recherché plutôt que le seul constat du prix de la mémoire.
This article caused me to check the SDRAM on my current desktop. I was shocked to find only 2 GB! The PC started life as a Windows 7 machine probably 15 years ago, but has run Linux for years with no distracting sluggishness. Mostly Internet browsing, word processing, spreadsheets, Python programming, and some video editing. I saw some speed gain when I changed to an SSD, but not a striking difference.
That would be my Mini-SC/MP kit computer in the eaely 1980s
256...
BYTES!
I did upgrade:
to 512 bytes,
and added a VDU card so's I could put a Merry Christmas message on our TV screen via the RD converter.
Fun days.
p.s. programmed in opcodes, entered one at a time by front panel switches :-)
Later when PCs arrived with the MSDOS operating system in the early 1980s, complex electronic circuit simulations could be carried out with a program using just 512kB of memory total. And the program supported graphics!
What we have now is just more and more 'bloatware'