Few pieces of software are as taken for granted as the browser. It’s the gateway to the internet – and at the same time one of the programs we think about the least. Most people just use whatever came preinstalled.

But is that really a good choice? And what actually sets Chrome, Firefox, Edge and Brave apart from each other – beyond the marketing promises?

Why your browser choice matters

The browser is the software through which nearly your entire digital life flows: email, banking, shopping, news, social media. What many people don’t realize is that your browser also determines what data gets collected about you, how fast pages load and how safe you are online.

Many people use Chrome for years simply because everyone else does. It’s only when you take a closer look that you realize how big the differences really are.

The four big contenders at a glance

Google Chrome is the undisputed heavyweight, holding roughly 65% of the market. It’s fast, reliable and has the largest selection of extensions. The catch: Chrome is made by Google – and Google makes its money from advertising based on user data. Chrome syncs your browsing history, bookmarks and passwords with your Google account by default. If you sign in to Chrome, you’re handing Google a very detailed picture of your browsing behavior.

Mozilla Firefox is the only major browser that isn’t backed by a tech giant – it’s developed by a nonprofit foundation. Firefox blocks third-party tracking cookies by default and offers solid privacy out of the box. Its market share, however, has shrunk significantly in recent years – from over 30% to the single digits today. That has nothing to do with quality and everything to do with Google using its market power to promote Chrome on every platform imaginable.

Microsoft Edge has been the default browser on Windows since Windows 10 and has been built on the same Chromium engine as Chrome since 2020. Technically, that makes it just as fast and compatible. Microsoft has equipped Edge with some useful features, including a built-in PDF reader and vertical tabs. On the privacy front, Edge is a bit more restrained than Chrome but still collects telemetry data for Microsoft. And Microsoft isn’t exactly subtle about pushing Edge on Windows users.

Brave is the outsider in the field. It’s also built on Chromium but blocks ads and trackers by default – no extension needed. Brave markets itself aggressively on privacy and speed. The downside: Brave has its own advertising model built in (optional, but it’s there).

Also worth mentioning: Vivaldi. Like the others, Vivaldi is Chromium-based, but it’s aimed at users who want to customize their browser down to the last detail. Vivaldi comes with a built-in ad blocker, an email client and extensive settings for tabs, interface and privacy. If you like to tinker, you’ll find more options here than in any other browser.

The privacy comparison: who collects what?

This is where the differences become truly tangible:

  • Chrome syncs your browsing history, search queries and bookmarks with your Google account. Google uses this data to build advertising profiles. While Google has phased out traditional third-party cookies, it has simultaneously introduced a new method called Topics that categorizes your browsing behavior locally on your device and shares those interest categories with advertisers. Most users never notice.
  • Firefox has blocked third-party tracking cookies by default since version 86 with its “Total Cookie Protection.” Firefox sends no usage data to advertisers. Mozilla is funded largely through its default search engine deal with Google – an awkward situation, but not a privacy problem.
  • Edge sends telemetry data to Microsoft, including diagnostic data and usage statistics. In the default settings, “optional” diagnostic data sharing is turned on. Microsoft offers tracking protection in three tiers – the default “Balanced” setting is a reasonable compromise.
  • Brave blocks ads, trackers and fingerprinting attempts by default. The browser collects no usage data and sends nothing to central servers. The optional “Brave Rewards” program shows its own ads and pays users in cryptocurrency – but you don’t have to enable it.

If privacy is your top priority, Firefox and Brave come out ahead. Chrome sits at the other end of the scale – not because it’s insecure, but because Google’s business model is built on analyzing your data.

Speed and resource usage

Chrome has long been known as a memory hog – and that’s still partly true today. If you keep a lot of tabs open, you’ll quickly notice that Chrome is generous with your RAM. Edge is a bit more frugal here, thanks to a feature Microsoft calls “sleeping tabs” that automatically puts inactive tabs into a low-resource state.

Firefox has caught up considerably in recent years and is now on par with the Chromium browsers in terms of speed. When it comes to memory usage, Firefox tends to be more efficient than Chrome.

Brave is often the fastest in everyday use thanks to its built-in ad blocker – simply because websites without ads and trackers need to load significantly less data.

Extensions and ecosystem

Chrome has by far the largest extension catalog. Since Edge, Brave and Vivaldi are also built on Chromium, most Chrome extensions work there too – a significant practical advantage.

Firefox has its own extension system. The most important extensions (uBlock Origin, Bitwarden, Dark Reader) are available for Firefox as well, but the selection is smaller. On the other hand, Mozilla has stricter review processes for extensions, which can be a security advantage.

An important point for anyone who uses uBlock Origin: Google has restricted Chrome’s extension interface (moving from “Manifest V2” to “Manifest V3”). This affects the full functionality of uBlock Origin. Firefox continues to support the previous interface – a real advantage for users who value effective ad blocking.

An honest assessment

There is no single best browser for everyone. The choice depends on what matters most to you:

  • You want maximum privacy with zero setup? Go with Brave. The ad blocker works right out of the box, and you don’t have to configure a thing.
  • You want privacy and independence from big tech? Go with Firefox. It’s the only browser not built on Google’s Chromium engine – and the last serious alternative to a browser monoculture.
  • You live in the Google ecosystem and convenience comes first? Chrome remains the most seamless package – but don’t kid yourself about the price you’re paying with your data.
  • You’re on Windows and want the smoothest experience? Edge is a solid choice that integrates with Windows better than any other browser. Just be sure to check the privacy settings and turn down the telemetry.
  • You want to customize your browser down to the last detail? Then Vivaldi is worth a look – no other browser offers as many configuration options.

One thing shouldn’t be forgotten, though: the best browser choice in the world doesn’t help much if you sign in everywhere with your Google account. The browser is only one piece of the puzzle – your own habits are the other.

What you can improve in five minutes

No matter which browser you use – these three steps will improve your situation right away:

  • Block third-party cookies. Every one of the four browsers lets you enable this in the settings (Firefox and Brave already do it by default).
  • Change your default search engine. Using Google as your browser’s search engine gives Google access to your search queries even without Chrome. Alternatives like DuckDuckGo or Startpage don’t pass along personalized data. We recently took a closer look at Google alternatives in a separate post.
  • Remove unnecessary extensions. Every extension can potentially access your browsing data. Less is more here.

The bottom line

Your browser choice is one of the few decisions in digital life that everyone can make – and one that actually makes a difference. After this overview, it should be clear that the most popular browser isn’t automatically the best. And that the most private browser isn’t the one you might expect, either.

Which browser do you use – and why? Have you switched recently? Feel free to share your experience in the comments.

Comments

5
Joe Bloggs
2 weeks ago
What about the Duckduckgo browser?
Like Like like love 6 Reply
2
swarfendor437
2 weeks ago
I stopped using DuckDuckGo search engine when I found out it started censoring searches. I use Mojeek search engine, and it uses open source anti-bot verification Altcha.
Like Like like 2 Reply
1
jbdpy
2 weeks ago
Mojeek is just bulshit. Not able to display what I have done when searching my name.
Like Like Reply
5
swarfendor437
2 weeks ago
There is an issue with Chrome you have not covered. It's latest release installs a 4 GB file to help train it's A.I. model. If you remove it, it just gets installed again and it does not offer an opt-out option.

I cannot see Edge being any better when you consider they admitted that their (Microsoft's) email client Outlook was gathering data for third parties.

Firefox sadly is largely dependent on a large amount of funding from Google and the flim-flam on it's new Privacy guidelines made one GNU/Linux distribution to switch to Brave. I use a fork of Firefox, zen browser. I also use Vivaldi for Finance and nothing else, stripping everything out that comes encumbered with.

Brave I can't stand with its history of crypto and something else which eludes my memory.

So in summary, I only use Zen Browser and Vivaldi on GNU/Linux, primarily on PCLOS Debian KDE Plasma edition.

On the phone (a Fairphone 6 from murena) it uses a blend of chromium with bromite.
Murena is looking to create a new browser not just for phones but also cross-platform browser 'Elixir'. Its shortcoming is that it intends to use the Qwant search engine which is 75% funded by a closed-source private company, so defeats the objective of Privacy, which will keep me using Mojeek search engine for the foreseeable future.

I was looking forward to the release of a new Desktop browser Ladybird, but when I found out they had used 200,000 lines of code generated by A.I. I have ditched the idea of ever trying it.
Like Like like 10 Reply
2
Cooltof
2 weeks ago
I’ve been using Vivaldi for several months (about a year?) instead of Firefox, which was becoming too ‘cluttered’. I’m really happy with Vivaldi; its email client is really efficient. It’s certainly very customisable, and it takes a bit of ‘work’ to set it up, but it’s the one that suits me best ;)
Like Like like 5 Reply
2
KMF
2 weeks ago
I have been using Vivaldi as my main browser since shortly after it came out, after learning it was developed by one of the cofounders of Opera. It's a great browser!
Like Like like 2 Reply
2
Paul Brasington
2 weeks ago
Vivaldi is more than a browser, though it is an excellent browser. It has built in mail and calendar accounts. It can sync with Microsoft and Google accounts if you really must, but if you create a (free) Vivaldi account you can keep your calendar data away from the prying eyes. It will sync with any calendar software that supports CALDAV.
Like Like like 5 Reply
3
thierry@vankerm.net
2 weeks ago
Indeed but it's not that easy to get the webmail. I'm unsuccessfully trying
Like Like like 1 Reply
1
Wisperbird
2 weeks ago
Ik ben onder de indruk van DuckDuckGo.
Je kunt gewoon zoeken of met hulp van AI. Ik vind dat ideaal.
Ook kun je zien wat het allemaal tegenhoudt. Ideaal.
Het geeft daarnaast een e-mailadres dat inkomende mail scannt op trackers.

Vertalen moet je over laten aan mensen!
Time flies like an arrow Tijdvliegen houden van een pijl.
En Brave blijft Brave. Niet vertalen met Moedig of Dapper !!!
Like Like Reply
1
SoftMaker
2 weeks ago
Just a small note: Our blog is available in German and English - we do not have a Dutch version, at least not yet. What you read was probably your browser’s automatic translation, and it mistakenly turned the product name “Brave” into “Dapper.” In our own texts, “Brave” of course remains “Brave.” We fully agree with you: product names should not be translated.
Like Like like 1 Reply
0
Wisperbird
2 weeks ago
Brave stays Brave. It's a name that should not be translated into "Dapper" or "Moedig". Dutch words for brave.
Like Like like 1 Reply
1
thierry@vankerm.net
2 weeks ago
Hi, thanks for the valuable information. Can you do the same with WebMail apps?
I'm looking for one, out of the Big Tech world, ideally European, with which I can gather my different emails and that I can easily manage on my computer and smartphone.
:-)
Like Like Reply
3
Jeroen
2 weeks ago
Vivaldi has webmail @vivaldi.net, the e-mail client is built in the browser, is very easy to import all your e-mail accounts even Proton with proton bridge, it also has a calendar. So it's an all in one solution and it is European. i like it.
Another alternative is Thunderbird. It is a great e-mail client and calendar and they are also starting an e-mailservice but its not up and running yet. you also import all your e-mail services easily in thunderbird and has a unified inbox. this is my personal favorite. Both worth looking at.

Note on Vivaldi. mobile doesn't support the e-mail client and calendar. just the desktop.
Thunderbird does both.
Like Like like 2 Reply
1
Stewart Smedley
2 weeks ago
I use Yandex browser, yes it is Russian, but which country listens to your browser!! It is quick, it is very stable and it works on different platforms, as one.
Like Like like 2 Reply
2
Richie
2 weeks ago
Duckduckgo browser for me
Like Like like 3 Reply
2
Søren
2 weeks ago
I use Vivaldi on all my devices.
Like Like like 2 Reply
3
John
2 weeks ago
Since Mozilla sold out the better browser options are Waterfox or Librewolf. Set default search as Startpage or DuckDuckGo. Overlay a Tailnet (Tailscale) or trusted VPN, a pihole, and Ublock Origin to enable blocking and element pickers, be very careful of your DNS server (I suggest a pihole with FTL and Unbound for control), or perhaps NextDNS or Cloudflare. Route everything through a Tailscale exit node that runs your pihole, and then you can start to use the Internet.
Like Like like 2 Reply
0
Barry
2 weeks ago
On the topic of Firefox-based browsers, Mullvad deserves a shoutout and arguably has the best anti-fingerprinting config right out of the box.
Like Like like 1 Reply
1
Thom
2 weeks ago
The Mullvad browser is not based on Firefox directly, it is a version of the Tor browser though it runs on vpn networks rather than the tor network.
Tor itself is based on Firefox, but is very different in its privacy settings and runs through encrypted routes.
Like Like like 1 Reply
0
Eric Davey
2 weeks ago
For the majority of users, that might as well not be in English. Why can't geeks speak in language that others might understand. I have a vague understanding of some of them, but telling us WHAT they are would help. 'pihole' just sounds like innuendo or slang to most people.
Like Like like 6 Reply
1
Jeroen
2 weeks ago
I tried them all. Vivaldi is nice and and practical but the built in email and calendar are just for the desktop version. not on your mobile.
Firefox is the only one not based on google and works very well. it deserves a much better spot and a bigger market share.
Brave is the most private, fast and it works well.
i'm not gonna mention chrome and edge for obvious reasons.
Like Like like 1 Reply
2
john
2 weeks ago
I've been using Opera for the last few years and really like it better than anything else that's out there. And I have tried them all
Like Like like 9 Reply
1
Richard
2 weeks ago
Thank you! I looked at the comments just to see if anyone mentioned Opera. It's been my browser as long as I can remember, from way before it became another chromium based browser.
Like Like like 2 Reply
2
brian
2 weeks ago
Agree. What's the downside to Opera?
Like Like like 1 Reply
0
Samson
2 weeks ago
Owned by China.
Like Like like 2 Reply
1
Roel
2 weeks ago
Opera was originally developed in Norway. It began as a research project at Telenor (the Norwegian telecom company) in 1994 and was spun off into its own company, Opera Software, in 1995, founded in Oslo.
Today, Opera has had a more complex corporate history — a consortium of Chinese investors acquired the company's browser business in 2016, and Opera Limited is now headquartered/incorporated with ties to both Norway and China, with operations in several countries. But its origins and initial development trace back to Norway.
Like Like Reply
1
Sven
2 weeks ago
I have been using Opera for many years, and I plan stay using it.
Like Like like 1 Reply
1
JR
2 weeks ago
This article could have been written better. You missed Safari, the Apple web browser. The 'remove unnecessary extensions' is dependent on the web browser that you use; websites work fine without Ublock Origin, but the browser runs faster if it doesn't download a bunch of ads. Also should mention compartmentalization: Chrome and Firefox allow profiles, so your regular browsing can be separate from your more sensitive work. Web browsers use engines to turn web page code into the page appearance, so if one web page doesn't work correctly on Chrome (which uses the Blink engine), you can try on Firefox (Gecko), or Pale Moon (Goanna). This would be more aligned like the search engine article, where Google, Bing, and Brave are 3 different search engine indexes.
Like Like like 3 Reply
1
Dirk
2 weeks ago
Firefox with uBlock origin since ever on the Linux computer and DuckDuckGo on the phone.
Because the boss runs an MS shop I use Office 365 via Brave.
Like Like Reply
2
Raphael Lytton
2 weeks ago
I agree - what about Apple's Safari, WaterFox -obviously baised on Firefox, but has much more and better privacy "out the box". THIS is not a small subject / issue and deserves much more information about each Browser.
Not shouting - for emphasis - WHAT I MOST CONCERNING, is that in the last couple of year more and more websites require a specific browser. eBay will not work properly with Firefox, so I have to use Safari, several of my bank accounts do not work with "Firefox" but will in a "Private Window",,, I have come across MANY sites that hang when running Ubuntu,,, which is really annoying.
Oh - and often my browser is using 2 or 3gig of memory,,, WHY - I am only reading text with a few pictures??? I am most concerned at that.
In the "GOOD OLD DAYS" - compatibility was MUCH better, and I still distrust and do not like sites that I can not open with Firefox v52 on my SnowLeopard !
Like Like like 3 Reply
1
Steve from Canada
2 weeks ago
I started in the world of Mosaic in the 90's and paid a lot for Netscape 1.0 3" disk when it came out. I personally want a top menu, and have always disliked the Chrome settings in a right pane which I find very confusing compared to drop-down Menus. I am very happy with the LibreWolf version of Firefox, with the menu, and U-block, and Duck search, and am a loyal fan. But I worry the organization gets sidetracked putting in more bells and whistles that are not needed. They should just stick to a stable version and let Libre fans add other features.
Like Like like 3 Reply
1
AlanC
2 weeks ago
I have always tinkered with alternative browsers and pay careful attention to Settings. My current problem-free browsers are:

Windows7: Firefox 115.37.0 esr, Vivaldi (get last version suitable for W7), Thorium browser for W7

Windows 10: Mullvad browser, Vivaldi, Librewolf, Thorium

Linux Ubuntu: Mullvad, Vivaldi, Librewolf,

Mullvad is the easiest to set up. Vivaldi even has a horizontal Menu Bar option - an essential feature for me.
Like Like like 1 Reply
1
Daniel
2 weeks ago
Also for Linux, consider Chromium - the core of Chrome, but with no Google entanglement. Look and feel like Chrome.

Chromium is also available as a portable app for Windows (Portableapps.com).
Like Like Reply
2
Chris
2 weeks ago
I've depended on Firefox for years, always with a second browser installed just in case. Lately the 'just in case' scenario becomes a reality when Firefox gets way too stringent on the security component and starts locking me out of some sites.

For instance, in Firefox, I just can't get past the Facebook captcha (which admittedly, I might do only once a month). And for our medical chart accounts, I can sign into mine but then not his because of some crazy cookie thing or other. This can be painful since I handle affairs for both of us on my laptop.

In such a case, the Brave browser does the job. Is it less secure? Maybe. But when I need to get something done ,so I can get onto the next task in life, I don't make time to dig into the particulars when it's time to check on lab results or pay a bill or shop.

We stay as far away from Google as possible for browsers and searches. It's bad enough our phones hear us even when we're not talking.
Like Like like 3 Reply
1
D M Smith
2 weeks ago
Am I the only one using Opera?
Like Like like 3 Reply
0
GC Griswold
2 weeks ago
Over the years I've tried most of the browsers mentioned in the article. My preferred mix is Firefox as my primary and Opera as my alternate.
Like Like like 2 Reply
0
Avtar Singh
2 weeks ago
For the last 15 years I am using Firefox as my primary browser, but also uses Google chrome and Edge for other purposes. Now I am testing Zen , a fork of Firefox.
Like Like Reply
1
Jan
2 weeks ago
Opera has been my primary browser from the start. The features are great. In the article I miss a remark that Vivaldi was developed by dissatisfied Opera developers. Why? And why are Opera and Safari left out of the article?

Brave is very nice but is irritating at one point: if I open a PDF in Safari I can send it as an attachment with sharing by email. In Brave, it will share the link, not the PDF itself, so the recipient can’t read it directly.

The options and interfaces of the browsers differ between iOS, Android and Windows. That’s annoying sometimes. E.g. not all browsers have a print to PDF function. The pre-installed PC at my work has Edge. Print to PDF is one nice feature of Edge (first time I can appreciate M$ software…)
Like Like Reply
0
Mole47
2 weeks ago
What about Safari?
Like Like Reply
1
Ellen
2 weeks ago
I have tried and used several browsers over the years. Now I stick mostly to DuckDuckGo and just recently duck.aI
Google is constantly popping up. There is a way to stop it, but now I can’t remember where I saw that information. I try to stay away from non-Apple type browsers.
Like Like Reply
0
Alex
2 weeks ago
What about ECOSIA. Works on Windows and Android but not Linux.
I am quite happy with it.
Like Like Reply
0
Rick
2 weeks ago
What's your take on Mac's Safari? I switched over from PC to Mac last year and Safari seems like it has some good features, but as a long-time Firefox user I stuck with what I knew to avoid disrupting workflow. Still wondering if I should go totally into the Apple universe or not.
Like Like like 2 Reply
0
Arius
2 weeks ago
You forgot about the Opera browser! Although it is also based on Chromium, its advantages over the others are obvious to the naked eye. There is no need to list its benefits here—those who use it already know. But for the sake of a fair comparison, this browser should have been mentioned too!
Like Like like 1 Reply
0
Opera
2 weeks ago
Opera
Like Like Reply
0
BSM
2 weeks ago
I've been using Vivaldi for at least 5 years. It does what it says on the box but if you're not happy with the box you can change it to your heart's content.

Who needs anything more?
Like Like Reply
0
fredfred
2 weeks ago
Thanks for the article and the comments. However as an inexperienced basic user it would help if Commentators stated what basic hardware - laptop desktop phone etc - their comments related to! (Laptop and phone).
Like Like like 1 Reply
0
Nelson Carvalho
2 weeks ago
Very good.
Thanks.
Like Like Reply
1
otavio - rio - Brasi
2 weeks ago
Quando usava windows usei muito tempo o ópera. Antes de mudar o motor para chromium era muito bom. Depois usei por longo tempo o vivaldi, muito bom. Troquei para o Brave pois achei mais rapido . Cheguei a usar o firefox mas ficava lento. Muto em outubro o sistema para LInux Mint. Por padrao vem o Firefox que no linux fica rápido. Hoje uso o Brave com a pesquisa no proprio Brave ao invés do Google. Tenho também em appimage o opera que funciona muito bem no Linux mint. Nada de Chrome nem pesquisa google. Infelizmente tenho que usar o Android no celular . Saí do Windows em outubro de 2025 com o fim do suporte do windows 10. Meu computador nao permite a instalacao do windows 11 . Foi a melhor coisa que aconteceu pois migrei para Linux e posso dizer que nem de graca volto para o Windows.
Like Like Reply
0
Max
2 weeks ago
Opera for me with duckduckGo search engine. Does everything and is quick. Can gobble memory with lots of tabs open but automatically has an efficiency mode which applies to open but not accessed tabs and saves memory.
All good to read but maybe redo your analysis with a bit wider scope?
Like Like like 1 Reply
0
CesarM
2 weeks ago
I use Opera browser for many years. Is good, no issues and i like some features. But i would like this article (it's very good by the way) touch opera browser in the analysis.
Thanks, very good blog!!
Like Like like 1 Reply
0
Ed Yap
2 weeks ago
I used Edge (with ad blockers), and never ever used Chrome. For many years before Edge I used Opera but ditched it when it gave up its Presto engine. Last year (or two years ago, I can't remember exactly) I chucked Edge in favor of Ungoogled Chromium.
Like Like Reply
0
PG
2 weeks ago
No one mentioned SRWare Iron yet.
I use it - beside Firefox - instead of Chrome. (It is practically the same, but without telemetry.)
Like Like Reply
0
M H Goldberg
2 weeks ago
Opera is my default browser. Get a message that it isn't supported by my bank's website but then works just fine. Use Firefox for Facebook with the fence extension running, and Brave to buy things on line. Chrome I need to read email for work and for an old Yahoo account used when I suspect giving out my address with generate spam.
Like Like Reply
0
Miguel
1 week ago
No se menciona SAFARI, que pueden aportar.
Like Like Reply
0
DrakoDrakkonis
1 week ago
Utilicé por muchos años Firefox por su extraordinario surtido de add-ons de gran utilidad, pero mi pasión se enfrió casi totalmente cuando ya no fue posible instalar el DownThemAll ni el formidable MozArchiver originales ( Sí, SingleFile es bueno en el archivado de páginas web, pero adolece de velocidad y versatilidad en el tema de las páginas múltiples ) .

Últimamente - viendo que ya le han agregado telemetrías e IA a su browser -, me está dando la sospecha de que Mozilla Foundation no está jugando muy limpio con sus usuarios.

Por eso, he probado algunos forks de Firefox y, por el momento, me he quedado con LibreWolf al que le puedo agregar sin problemas los add-ons NoScript y Privacy Badger.

Por el lado de Chrome ( que nunca usé como tampoco me interesa el buscador de Google ) y sus chorrocientos clones, estoy probando actualmente Helium: Es excelente aunque carece de dos o tres funciones que, por ejemplo Vivaldi u Opera ofrecen, pero no es para cortarse las venas, tampoco.

Sin embargo,Helium es el primer clon de Chrome que uso cuyo uBlock trabaja limpiamente al 100%, mientras que en los otros browsers esta extensión deja mucho que desear.

En el campo de Android me decanto más por DuckDuckGo, aunque también vengo probando Fulguris, que no es paquidérmico: En el sistema, ocupa cinco veces menos espacio que DuckDuckGo y casi diez veces menos espacio que Vivaldi, y trabaja estupendamente en la navegación con la ayuda del pato.
Like Like Reply
0
VA
1 week ago
Sorry you did not include Opera in your evaluation. I used Mozilla for a while but I think they DO have quality issues, or may be just difficult to navigate. I keep coming back to Opera on my Win 10, and stay with Safari on my Apple devices. Both seem to have the right balance between safety/privacy and convenience.
Like Like Reply
0
Jorge
1 week ago
What can you say about "Opera"
Like Like Reply
1
Mukti
1 week ago
Some of the claims in this piece are out of date according to Gemini.

Query: Is this true as of June 2026: "While Google has phased out traditional third-party cookies, it has simultaneously introduced a new method called Topics that categorizes your browsing behavior locally on your device and shares those interest categories with advertisers."

Model: No, that is not true as of July 2026. The information you provided describes a strategy that Google has abandoned.

The situation as of July 2026 is as follows:

• **Third-party cookies are not being phased out:** Google abandoned its original plan to deprecate third-party cookies in Chrome. They remain supported and active in the browser.

• **The Privacy Sandbox initiative is retired:** Google officially ended the initiative in October 2025. It is no longer the framework for Chrome's advertising strategy.

• **The Topics API is being removed:** Following the end of the Privacy Sandbox, the Topics API was scheduled for deprecation in Chrome 144 (January 2026) and is currently in the process of being removed from the codebase.

The "Topics" method was a component of the Privacy Sandbox initiative, and because that initiative has been discontinued, the technology is no longer part of Chrome's functional roadmap.
Like Like Reply
0
Al
1 week ago
Vivaldi for the last year.

It pays to be a CEO of a browser company

"Mozilla is a notable browser-adjacent nonprofit/commercial hybrid, and discussion around its filings indicates CEO pay in the multi-million-dollar range, with 2022 total pay cited at about $6.9 million and 2023 total pay at about $6.26 million in secondary reporting."

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/ea327ca0-11ec-45d8-b450-9e7ae1aaa6a0
Like Like Reply
0
swarfendor437
1 week ago
I think that including Firefox as a better browser is incorrect:

https://youtu.be/Rc96ISKh2OM?si=DawXMMi6H-wJ6PrG
Like Like Reply
0
Sergio Oscar Souto
1 week ago
Los uso todos, cada uno para cosas distintas. En general prefiero Vivaldi, tanto en desktop como en el movil.
Like Like Reply
0
Charles Kroeger
1 week ago
You know on Debian sid, both Chrome and Opera cannot display a right click menu, using the latest sid upgrades. If it wasnt for Firefox I would not have a usable browser on the XFCE4 desktop. My Google AI tried many solutions involving different fonts settings in XFCE, dark and light displays and it all came up pinche nada.This problem has persisted now almost a year. These browsers can't show even the URL in the address bar. The can show a website launched from an icon in your bookmarks list but without the right click menus forget about much inter activities with the site.

Firefox has gradually taken over all my browser needs but in Firefox you can still select your default search and I've had great success with Startpage nee IXquick. Startpage also has a bonus feather ..type in a hard to spell word in any language and its excellent algorithm almost always comes up with the word and adds the meaning and usage examples, so you get a better dictionary by algorithm than the Student OED. That's no small feat.
Like Like Reply
0
kuka
1 week ago
There is no way to avoid spying on you in our new brave world one way or another, so I'm OK with Google. It's an illusion you can restrict a leak of your personal information. Nobody mention digital fingerprint - unique set of settings of your current environment - OS, browser, set of software installed on your device with their settings. Overall it gives away your own unique image that can be easily identified. It leaks through cookies and there is no way you can completely turn them off. Partially - yes, but one time and it's enough to show your identity. So you want privacy - have completely default settings and set of software - it doesn't hide you, it will make you just like anybody else and this makes spying harder. The only way is to blend in.

You don't want target advertising - don't pay any attention to banners, offers, anything that is not information you need - your brain can do it perfectly. From the beginning of time I'm just ignoring, skipping all this garbage on my screen. It works. The only problem is (or was) the traffic. But blocking doesn't help - it just doesn't show all this garbage to you, however it still eats your traffic. There are ways to avoid this, but it costs. So you have wonderful alternative - to let spies to sell your personal information or to pay somebody else for your privacy. The difference is the amount - your browsing habits are hard to estimate in exact amount, but you know exactly how much you pay for your privacy. So it's your choice. But your only choice is to pick one or another.

Well, my own habits are not unique. I liked Opera very much until they stopped their Presto engine project. Two founders parted their ways - one came to Chinese, another founded Vivaldi. I asked him about Presto perspectives and he answered that it's intellectual property of both Opera founders and can not be used by one of them only. End of story. So now I use Vivaldi, Opera, Chrome, Chromium, Edge, Firefox on different devices with no preferences. More often Vivaldi and Chrome/Chromium. Some services use cookies for automatic login, so if you have several accounts, it doesn't work flawlessly, so I just log in there with different browsers. Yes, I'm lazy, sorry.

About other browsers. By the way, Sun corporation developed HotJava browser completely on Java and I liked it very much. Later it came to Oracle as a part of Sun purchase. Last time it was updated 2004. Another light weighted browser was Galeon, later Epiphania and now Gnome Web - for Posix systems only as I know - don't keep an eye on it any more. Good old days...
Like Like Reply
0
DBowen
6 days ago
Thank you for the summary. I have stuck with Firefox from way back in the 80's/90's mainly because it's straightforward and uncomplicated, without the
gaudy interface of browsers like Edge which can actually frighten off new users
like OAP's etc.
Also, it's very quick and easy to get rid of cookies after a session.
I recently had a need to download Xray results from the web, which "imperatively" specified that I had to use Chrome. Firefox handled it OK.
Like Like Reply
0
claustrophobe
6 days ago
What are extensions? What do they do in a browser? How are they added? Firefox makes a big deal about new ones but I'm still clueless...
Like Like Reply
0
Kent
2 days ago
Firefox gets financial support in a couple of ways not mentioned in the article. 1) Sponsored links appear at the bottom of the home page if the user has activated the display of links to frequently used sites. 2) Sponsored web-available stories, including some that are just ads, are listed on the home page, below the rows of frequently visited sites -- if the user has activated that feature of Firefox. I find both of these features useful and don't mind having some sponsored stuff mixed in, since I know it helps Firefox stay in business.
Like Like Reply
0
jrk
Yesterday
I've been using FireFox for at least 10 years. It has my vote, if for no other reason, it is not Big Tech owned and run and does not sell my information.
I just started using Startpage as my search engine and I like it even though it's look is a little "plain".
Like Like Reply
0
Jan Smit
Yesterday
Er zijn heel veel goede browsers.Diegene die ook echt veilig zijn.Maar daar naast kun je de beveiliging van windows zelf gebruiken,ik heb een beveiliging uit de top drie,om geen reclame te maken.Mijn beveiliging kan niet met alle browsers omgaan,wel voor een klein deel.Maar nog iets,in deze tijd >>Ga je eens iets verdiepen in linux (heel veel versies) met een mooie veilige & helemaal gratis UBUNTU.Om te leren.Je kunt het testen(op USB stick)en zelfs in dualboot gebruiken met je eigen windows & verder met nog veel meer mogelijkheden.Groetjes
Like Like Reply

Add comment

Submit